New EMA Guidance: Quality Management of Electronic Systems

9/08/2020

-

On April 7, 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released a Notice to sponsors on validation and qualification of computerized systems used in clinical trials. This guidance is applicable for clinical trials conducted in the EU and clarifies that even though a sponsor may delegate all or part of clinical trial activities out to a company, the ultimate responsibility for validation of software tools or electronic systems remains with the sponsor. This guidance also clarifies that most vendors focus on system security of the participant’s personal data, but they lack a focus on how an electronic system used in a clinical trial must comply with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the documentation principles of ALCOA+.

Clinical Trial Risk & Performance Management vSummit Sept. 8th - 12th

9/01/2020

-

Sandra “SAM” Sather, VP of Clinical Pathways and a 2020 MCC Ambassador, is speaking on the topic “The RBM Training Gap: Risk-Based Monitoring the Noun vs. the Verb”. Have you heard "We are not doing RBM for this study . . ." What? Our quality system should support a risk-based approach to many clinical trial activities like site monitoring, data quality oversight, vendor oversight, safety surveillance, audit planning, and more.

Civil Money Penalties & the ClinicalTrials.gov Data Bank Final Guidance

8/25/2020

-

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a final guidance “Civil Money Penalties Relating to the ClinicalTrials.gov Data Bank.” It clarifies how the FDA determines the “responsible parties” have submitted registration information when required, that the information submitted is factual, and when noncompliance results in civil money penalties.

Live Webinar Risk Mitigation Changes with ICH E6(R3) and E8(R1) August 25th

8/18/2020

-

Change is coming again. Expected updates to ICH GCP E6(R2) and ICH E8 support the agility and adaptability we need to reach the levels of study design, management, and conduct closest to the data and subjects. Taking these theoretical concepts into flexible, reliable, and accountable practices is the next step in more effective trials.

Is it Really Consent? Considerations in Consenting COVID-19 Patients to Clinical Trials

8/11/2020

-

During the pandemic, it has become evident that we must continue to consent COVID-19 patients into clinical trials as we work to discover treatment options and better understand other aspects of the disease. Because of isolation restrictions, it is more cumbersome for all involved to conduct the informed consent process as we are accustomed. The investigator or delegate is likely not permitted into the isolation room to discuss the aspects of the trial with the potential subject. This leads to barriers to their ability to see important facial features communicated during a conversation.