-
On June 2, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced the launch of their Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool: Elsa. AI has been seen in many parts of the clinical research ecosystem in recent years such as trial and protocol design, participant recruitment, and safety monitoring, all of which have the potential to enhance trial efficiency and safety.
-
On December 19th, 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration released the finalized guidance for industry: Processes and Practices Applicable to Bioresearch Monitoring Inspections. The guidance details the processes and practices of Bioresearch Monitoring Program (BIMO) inspections of FDA-regulated establishments NOT specified in existing FDA guides or manuals.
-
On September 8th, 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released their final guidance for industry on the ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice (GCP). ICH E6(R3) Principles and Annex 1 were finalized on January 6th, 2025, officially taking over the preceding 2016 ICH E6(R2). Annex 2 is expected to be finalized in early 2026.
-
On December 15th, 2025, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released the finalized guidance for industry “Investigator Responsibilities — Safety Reporting for Investigational Drugs and Devices”. Unlike most updates, this finalized guidance is replacing the FDA’s recommendations from two separate final guidance documents: “Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs and BA/BE Studies” from 2012 and “Adverse Event Reporting to IRBs—Improving Human Subject Protection” from 2009, both of which are now withdrawn.
-
On July 7, 2025, the European Union (EU) Commission and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S) published an updated draft of Annex 11: Computerised Systems, a supplementary guideline that is part of the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP). Although it is GMP focused, the guiding principles of the annex can also be applied to other GxP standards.
Promeditec has developed a package that enables the user to carry out remote monitoring of clinical trials. Virtual On Site Monitoring (VOS) integrates high-cost traditional monitoring with an innovative method that leads to significant reduction in time and cost by eliminating the need for monitor relocation.
Monitoring clinical data is a critical part of trial success. Part of doing this effectively is efficiency, so a question being asked more frequently is “why not monitor source data remotely?” This course discusses the feasibility of remote monitoring of source data in compliance with predicate rules, including HIPAA, FDA, as well as mandates outside the US.
